Circulating Nampt and RBP4 levels in patients with carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA)

Abstract:

BACKGROUND\backslashr\backslashnObesity is a risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Altered adipokine secretion, including increased production of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (Nampt) and retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) may link adipose tissue dysfunction to cardiovascular complications.\backslashr\backslashnMETHODS\backslashr\backslashnWe determined Nampt and RBP4 serum concentrations in 193 consecutive patients with carotid stenosis prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to recently experienced ischemic events, markers of atherosclerosis and obesity, as well as anthropometric and clinical characteristics.\backslashr\backslashnRESULTS\backslashr\backslashnNampt but not RBP4 was significantly higher in symptomatic patients who experienced an ischemic event within 6 months before surgery compared to asymptomatic patients (p=0.001). In multivariate regression analysis Nampt was the only independent predictor of symptomatic carotid stenosis. Nampt correlated with peripheral leukocyte blood count (p\textless0.0001) and with the number of macrophages/foam cells within carotid plaques (p=0.042). However, Nampt and RBP4 serum concentrations did not correlate with the maximum percentage of carotid stenosis.\backslashr\backslashnCONCLUSION\backslashr\backslashnOur data suggest circulating Nampt as an independent predictor of recently experienced ischemic events in patients with carotid stenosis despite the lack of an association between Nampt and carotid atherosclerosis severity. BACKGROUND Obesity is a risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Altered adipokine secretion, including increased production of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (Nampt) and retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) may link adipose tissue dysfunction to cardiovascular complications. METHODS We determined Nampt and RBP4 serum concentrations in 193 consecutive patients with carotid stenosis prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in relation to recently experienced ischemic events, markers of atherosclerosis and obesity, as well as anthropometric and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Nampt but not RBP4 was significantly higher in symptomatic patients who experienced an ischemic event within 6 months before surgery compared to asymptomatic patients (p=0.001). In multivariate regression analysis Nampt was the only independent predictor of symptomatic carotid stenosis. Nampt correlated with peripheral leukocyte blood count (p\textless0.0001) and with the number of macrophages/foam cells within carotid plaques (p=0.042). However, Nampt and RBP4 serum concentrations did not correlate with the maximum percentage of carotid stenosis. CONCLUSION Our data suggest circulating Nampt as an independent predictor of recently experienced ischemic events in patients with carotid stenosis despite the lack of an association between Nampt and carotid atherosclerosis severity.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.03.008

Projects: Genetical Statistics and Systems Biology

Publication type: Journal article

Journal: Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry

Human Diseases: No Human Disease specified

Citation: Clinica Chimica Acta 412(13-14):1195-1200

Date Published: 1st Jun 2011

Registered Mode: imported from a bibtex file

Authors: Gabriela Aust, Migle Uptaite-Patapoviene, Markus Scholz, Olaf Richter, Silvio Rohm, Matthias Blüher

Help
help Submitter
Citation
Aust, G., Uptaite-Patapoviene, M., Scholz, M., Richter, O., Rohm, S., & Blüher, M. (2011). Circulating Nampt and RBP4 levels in patients with carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In Clinica Chimica Acta (Vol. 412, Issues 13-14, pp. 1195–1200). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.03.008
Activity

Views: 704

Created: 14th Sep 2020 at 13:13

Last updated: 7th Dec 2021 at 17:58

help Tags

This item has not yet been tagged.

help Attributions

None

Related items

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies