Publications

238 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 238

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: A. Lagemann, Reinhold Haux, Alfred Winter

Date Published: No date defined

Publication Type: Misc

Abstract (Expand)

Research software registries play an integral role in the process of making software findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR). However, there are no guidelines available for FAIRifying registries listing research software. Identifying applicable criteria is a necessary step to develop recommendations that apply to software registries and can later be utilized to measure and improve their FAIRness. Principles that relate to FAIR research software were mapped to granular metrics. Afterwards, registry-applicable aspects were selected and summarized. This resulted in 17 aspects directed at metadata listed in research software registries. Each aspect is expressed in three tables, allowing easy access to relevant information as well as resolvable references to previous works regarding FAIRification. These can be used to develop new, quantifiable metrics. They also provide a meaningful reference point when establishing or improving such registries, an increasingly relevant field in light of the upcoming international initiatives, such as the EOSC.

Authors: W. Herbst, C. Draeger, M. Perbix, A. Winter, M. Lobe

Date Published: 8th Apr 2025

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Konrad Höffner, Thomas Pause, Franziska Jahn, Hannes Raphael Brunsch, Anna Brakemeier, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 1st Jul 2024

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Alfred Winter, Elske Ammenwerth, Reinhold Haux, Michael Marschollek, Bianca Steiner, Franziska Jahn

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Book

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Franziska Jahn, Elske Ammenwerth, Verena Dornauer, Konrad Høffner, Michelle Bindel, Thomas Karopka, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

Clinical Trial Recruitment Support Systems can booster patient inclusion of clinical trials by automatically analyzing eligibility criteria based on electronic health records. However, missing interoperability has hindered introduction of those systems on a broader scale. Therefore, our aim was to develop a recruitment support system based on FHIR R4 and evaluate its usage and features in a cardiology department. Clinical conditions, anamnesis, examinations, allergies, medication, laboratory data and echocardiography results were imported as FHIR resources. Clinical trial information, eligibility criteria and recruitment status were recorded using the appropriate FHIR resources without extensions. Eligibility criteria linked by the logical operation “OR” were represented by using multiple FHIR Group resources for enrollment. The system was able to identify 52 of 55 patients included in four clinical trials. In conclusion, use of FHIR for defining eligibility criteria of clinical trials may facilitate interoperability and allow automatic screening for eligible patients at multiple sites of different healthcare providers in the future. Upcoming changes in FHIR should allow easier description of “OR”-linked eligibility criteria.

Authors: Clemens Scherer, Stephan Endres, Martin Orban, Stefan Kääb, Steffen Massberg, Alfred Winter, Matthias Löbe

Date Published: 1st May 2022

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Konrad Höffner, Arne Roszeitis, Max Niclas Wächtler, Franziska Jahn, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2022

Publication Type: Journal article

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies