Filter and export

Publications

216 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 216
The Integrated Data Repository Toolkit (IDRT): Accelerating translational research infrastructures
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics 2015, 5:S6. doi:10.1186/2043-9113-5-S1-S6

Authors: Christian R. Bauer, Thomas Ganslandt, Benjamin Baum, Jan Christoph, Igor Engel, Matthias Löbe, Sebastian Mate, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Ulrich Sax, Sebastian Stäubert, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal article

System Analysis of Information Management
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Christian Kücherer, Manuel Jung, Franziska Jahn, Michael Schaaf, Kais Tahar, Barbara Paech, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: InCollection

[Benchmarking of hospital information systems – a comparison of benchmarking clusters in German-speaking countries] Benchmarking von Krankenhausinformationssystemen – eine vergleichende Analyse deutschsprachiger Benchmarkingcluster
Management of health information systems

Abstract (Expand)

Die Methode des Benchmarkings wird mittlerweile in vielen Krankenhäusern als Instrument des strategischen Informationsmanagements genutzt. Während der letzten Jahre bildeten sich im deutschsprachigen … Raum mehrere Benchmarkingcluster, innerhalb derer sich Krankenhäuser bezüglich der Kosten, Leistung und Effizienz ihrer Informationssysteme und ihres Informationsmanagements vergleichen und positionieren. Um Benchmarkingcluster hinsichtlich ihrer Merkmale unterscheiden zu können und eine Entscheidungsunterstützung für die Auswahl eines geeigneten Benchmarkingclusters zu schaffen, wird ein Klassifikationsschema entwickelt. Das Klassifikationsschema betrachtet sowohl die Rahmenbedingungen der Benchmarkingcluster sowie deren inhaltliche Ausrichtung. Es wird auf sieben im deutschsprachigen Raum und in den letzten Jahren aktive Benchmarkingcluster angewandt, um diese zu beschreiben. Derzeit überwiegt das Performance Benchmarking, wobei sich die Benchmarkingcluster hinsichtlich der Anzahl der Benchmarkingpartner und der Kooperationsformen unterscheiden. Auch werden unterschiedliche Benchmarkingobjekte betrachtet. Die Untersuchung von Kosten und Qualität von Anwendungssystemen, physischen Datenverarbeitungssystemen, Organisationsstrukturen des Informationsmanagements und IT-Service-Prozessen dominiert. Untersuchungen zum strategischen Informationsmanagement, taktischen Informationsmanagement, der IT Governance und der Qualität von Daten und datenverarbeitenden Prozessen können noch ausgebaut werden. Auf Basis des Klassifikationsschemas und der Analyse der Benchmarkingcluster werden schließlich allgemeine Empfehlungen für das Benchmarking von Krankenhausinformationssystemen abgeleitet.

Authors: Franziska Jahn, Klaus Baltschukat, Uwe Buddrus, Uwe Günther, Ansgar Kutscha, Jan-David Liebe, Volker Lowitsch, Helmut Schlegel, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2015

Publication Type: Journal article

Past and next 10 years of medical informatics
Management of health information systems

Abstract (Expand)

More than 10 years ago Haux et al. tried to answer the question how health care provision will look like in the year 2013. A follow-up workshop was held in Braunschweig, Germany, for 2 days in May, … 2013, with 20 invited international experts in biomedical and health informatics. Among other things it had the objectives to discuss the suggested goals and measures of 2002 and how priorities on MI research in this context should be set from the viewpoint of today. The goals from 2002 are now as up-to-date as they were then. The experts stated that the three goals: \textquotedblpatient-centred recording and use of medical data for cooperative care\textquotedbl; \textquotedblprocess-integrated decision support through current medical knowledge\textquotedbl and \textquotedblcomprehensive use of patient data for research and health care reporting\textquotedbl have not been reached yet and are still relevant. A new goal for ICT in health care should be the support of patient centred personalized (individual) medicine. MI as an academic discipline carries out research concerning tools that support health care professionals in their work. This research should be carried out without the pressure that it should lead to systems that are immediately and directly accepted in practice.

Authors: F. Uckert, Elske Ammenwerth, C. Dujat, A. Grant, Reinhold Haux, A. Hein, A. Hochlehnert, Petra Knaup-Gregori, C. Kulikowski, J. Mantas, V. Maojo, M. Marschollek, L. Moura, M. Plischke, R. Rohrig, Jürgen Stausberg, K. Takabayashi, Alfred Winter, Klaus-Hendrik Wolf, A. Hasman

Date Published: 1st Jul 2014

Publication Type: Journal article

Assessing the prognoses on health care in the information society 2013 - thirteen years after
Management of health information systems

Abstract (Expand)

Health care and information technology in health care is advancing at tremendous speed. We analysed whether the prognoses by Haux et al. - first presented in 2000 and published in 2002 [1] - have been … fulfilled in 2013 and which might be the reasons for match or mismatch. Twenty international experts in biomedical and health informatics met in May 2013 in a workshop to discuss match or mismatch of each of the 71 prognoses. After this meeting a web-based survey among workshop participants took place. Thirty-three prognoses were assessed matching; they reflect e.g. that there is good progress in storing patient data electronically in health care institutions. Twenty-three prognoses were assessed mismatching; they reflect e.g. that telemedicine and home monitoring as well as electronic exchange of patient data between institutions is not established as widespread as expected. Fifteen prognoses were assessed neither matching nor mismatching. ICT tools have considerably influenced health care in the last decade, but in many cases not as far as it was expected by Haux et al. in 2002. In most cases this is not a matter of the availability of technical solutions but of organizational and ethical issues. We need innovative and modern information system architectures which support multiple use of data for patient care as well as for research and reporting and which are able to integrate data from home monitoring into a patient centered health record. Since innovative technology is available the efficient and wide-spread use in health care has to be enabled by systematic information management.

Authors: Petra Knaup-Gregori, Elske Ammenwerth, C. Dujat, A. Grant, A. Hasman, A. Hein, A. Hochlehnert, C. Kulikowski, J. Mantas, V. Maojo, M. Marschollek, L. Moura, M. Plischke, R. Rohrig, Jürgen Stausberg, K. Takabayashi, F. Uckert, Alfred Winter, Klaus-Hendrik Wolf, Reinhold Haux

Date Published: 1st Jul 2014

Publication Type: Journal article

Anforderungen an ein modernes und umfassendes Informationsmanagement für Krankenhäuser
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Not specified

Author: Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2014

Publication Type: InCollection

How to Assess Quality of Electronic Health Record Systems
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Not specified

Author: Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2014

Publication Type: InCollection

Navigate

Health Atlas - Local Data Hub/Leipzig

The Health Atlas - Local Data Hub/Leipzig is an alliance of medical ontologists, medical systems biologists and clinical trials groups to design and implement a multi-functional and quality-assured atlas. It provides models, data and metadata on specific use cases from medical research fields.

Registered Repository

re3data.org Badge
Powered by
 (v.1.13.0-master)
Health Atlas | Funding and Programmes | Credits | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Imprint
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies